A History of the Original Yonge Subway

Yonge line map

Text by James Bow.

See also:

Getting Started (See also Early History)

Since the Town of York was founded in 1793, the east-west “Main Street” of what became the City of Toronto has shifted north as the city has grown out from its original boundaries. The main north-south thoroughfare, however, quickly became Yonge Street and has remained Yonge Street ever since. This former dirt highway running from Lake Ontario to Holland Marsh, named after a friend of Governor Simcoe, eventually connected a string of towns and villages to the provincial capital. Pressed against Lake Ontario to the south, the City of Toronto has grown north along this axis since its founding.

It is no surprise that, when the City of Toronto started to come of age, the first subway proposals suggested running trains beneath or near this main thoroughfare. A number of proposals emerged between 1909 and 1912, but the public rejected subways in a plebiscite in 1912, forcing the issue into dormancy for another thirty years.

Toronto continued to grow through the 20s and the 30s, and so did society’s love affair with the automobile. Then the Second World War arrived. Although the onset of hostilities put car buying on hold and brought passengers back to the streetcars, the flow of commuters from home to work strained Toronto’s road and transit network. The end of hostilities and the repatriated soldiers would mean that development, suppressed after fifteen years of depression and war, would suddenly revive and explode. This prospect convinced many, the TTC among them, that bold action had to be taken to prevent the city from choking on its own traffic.

The TTC formed a Rapid Transit Department and worked on a proposal between 1942 and 1946. Finally, the TTC proposed a “rapid transit subway” beneath Yonge Street running from Eglinton Avenue south to Front Street and then west along Front to Union Station. A Queen streetcar subway would operate to the north of Queen Street from Trinity Park to McCaul, beneath Queen Street from McCaul to Mutual, and then north of Queen Street in an open cut from Mutual to St. Paul. The matter was put to voters on a January 1, 1946, plebiscite and overwhelmingly approved. Toronto City Council approved construction four months later.

Construction Begins (See Also: How Cut and Cover Works)

The 1946 referendum approved construction on the condition that the federal government could subsidize the project by 20%. The proposed federal funding never materialized. Although the federal Minister of Reconstruction, C.D. Howe, sent a letter on October 3, 1945, promising the TTC financial assistance, the deal fell through when the federal Government and the Province of Ontario failed to agree on a postwar employment program that would support the project. The city proceeded with the subway anyway, scaling down the proposal. The Queen streetcar subway was temporarily forgotten, and what had begun as a two-subway project costing $42.3 million was reduced to a single line costing an estimated $28.9 million plus $3.5 million for rolling stock.

North from Ellis Portal

Curt Frey donated this photograph (possibly by P. Lambert) of the subway construction north of Ellis Portal and Davenport Road. Rosedale station is under construction in the distance.

Construction began on September 8, 1949 (two years late due to post-war shortages) with the City of Toronto launching work with a ceremony emceed by Monty Hall. Ontario’s Lieutenant-Governor Ray Lawson climbed inside a pile driver and pulled the first lever to pound the first “soldier” beam into place. All the local radio stations carried the entire event live. The official party then moved to the Royal York Hotel while the real workers got down to work.

“Cut-and-cover” technique was chosen as the means to build the underground portions of the 7.4 kilometre (4.6 mile) line. This was chosen because it was far less expensive than using a tunnel bore. A large trench was dug into Yonge Street, utilities relocated, and steel cross members welded into place. These steel cross members were then used to support heavy timbers that provided a deck that allowed traffic to return to the street while work proceeded beneath. A total of 1.7 million cubic yards (1.3 million cubic metres) of material were removed and some 14,000 tons (12,700 metric tons) of reinforcing steel and 1.4 million bags of cement were put into place. The material removed was trucked to Ashbridges Bay and was used to create acres of new land out of Lake Ontario.

As construction headed north from Front Street, crews ran into solid rock, three to eight feet in depth, stretching as far north as Queen Street. This required dynamite charges to remove, and blasts occurred twice daily, at noon and 4:30 pm. Most of the subway construction proceeded without incident. The only serious accident to occur was not fatal, but resulted in the area south of Adelaide Street being seriously flooded, to a depth of 20 feet in places. Following a heavy rain on July 24, 1950, a temporary storm sewer gave way and caused the mess.

The use of temporary decking reduced the inevitable traffic disruption caused by cut-and-cover construction. Traffic was interrupted only during the initial excavation before the cut was deep enough to deck over, and then when the decking was finally removed to allow the street to be rebuilt. But streetcar diversions were still necessary. The TTC went so far as to lay down temporary streetcar tracks on such side streets as Alexander, as opposed to longer diversions along the streets which already had tracks in place. Although the track was temporary in nature, and probably built using spare or surplus materials, the TTC still took the time to set these temporary tracks into the streets, instead of laying them on the surface. A number of railfans snapped shots of Witt trains operating on these single tracks through residential neighbourhoods.

College station picture

Artist conceptions of College (above) and Wellesley (below) stations. Wellesley station has changed considerably, with a building built above the original bus terminal.

Wellesley station picture

The Yonge line was initially to be cut and cover from Front Street up to north of College (Alexander Street), after which the line would jog approximately 150 feet east of Yonge Street and proceed north in an “open cut”. The line would be open to the air, although below the general height of land, passing beneath a number of bridges carrying the cross streets. However, this would have required a large number of houses and buildings to be demolished, and the resulting trench might have reduced the nearby property values, it was feared. As a result, it was decided that cut and cover would be continued as far north as Davenport.

The cut-and-cover technique still required the demolition of many homes, although it left developable land behind once tunnel construction was complete. When the subway passed beneath buildings that weren’t to be demolished (including areas around Bloor Street, St. Clair and possibly Summerhill stations), great care was taken to support the buildings while work continued beneath. Concrete underpinning was placed under foundations and cellar floors temporarily removed as the excavation continued down for several feet. Concrete “caissons” were then poured to support one end of a steel girder that would support the buildings above, and prevent the roof of the subway tunnel caving in below. Once the subway structure was built, all excavation was backfilled and the buildings got their cellar floors back.

North of Church Street and Davenport Road, the line emerged from tunnel. This is the only tunnel portal on the TTC to bear a sign naming it: Ellis Portal, named after a street in the area that disappeared as a result of the subway construction. From Ellis Portal, the line proceeded north in an open cut to the Canadian Pacific tracks near the former North Toronto station. Here, the line dove underground again to Shaftesbury Avenue, two blocks north. This section was tunnelled beneath the tracks (without the telltale round bore, suggesting that this short section was mined), as the railway would not have appreciated cut-and-cover construction. Emerging in an open cut again, the line continued north to Woodlawn Avenue, then dove underground for St. Clair station and to cross Yonge Street, emerging just north of Lawton. A large tract of land near the Belt Line railway was cleared to make way for Davisville yard. Alexander Muir Memorial Garden, which occupied the site, was moved north to its present location on Yonge Street and St. Edmund’s Drive in Lawrence Park. The relocation cost $100,000 and the relocated park reopened on May 28, 1952.

Proceeding north through open cut, the line dove underground again at Berwick. The complex at Eglinton station was built on the site of TTC’s Eglinton carhouse. As construction continued, the carhouse was converted into a bus and trolley bus operation, in anticipation of the removal of streetcars from the Yonge streetcar line.

Initially, it was expected that the Yonge subway would be finished in 1953, but the Korean War intervened. The resulting steel shortage dragged the work on until 1954. The final cost of the Yonge subway was tallied at $67 million.

Southbound towards Ellis Portal

A Gloucester train led by car number 5029 heads southbound from Rosedale station towards Ellis Portal. Photo donated by Curt Frey.

Toronto’s First Subway Cars

With the construction of the subway well underway, the TTC set about searching for equipment to operate on it. They turned, first of all, to New York and Chicago, two large cities with well-established or developing subway networks. In particular, they seriously considered Chicago’s 6000 series PCC rapid transit cars, built by St. Louis Car Company using components salvaged from 4000 series Chicago PCC streetcars. Early drawings of the Yonge subway show trains comprised of cars about as long as PCCs, and in roughly the same colour scheme.

North of Davisville Yard

A Gloucester train heads northbound along the open cut between Davisville and Eglinton stations. Photo donated by Curt Frey.

As it had found when it tried to purchase new PCCs in the early 1950s, the price tag for PCC-style subway cars was much too high for the TTC’s liking, both from Canadian and United States car builders, and the Commission went further afield. They finally settled upon the Gloucester Railway Carriage and Wagon Company in Gloucester, England, purchasing technology similar to what was being run on the London Underground. The history of these cars are covered in more detail in their own web page.

North of Davisville Yard

North of the Davisville yard lead, two Gloucesters pass each other. This shot is taken from the Manor Road footbridge between Yonge Street and Duplex Avenue with the Hillsdale Avenue bridge in the background. Photo donated by Curt Frey.

The first order for Toronto’s first subway cars was placed in November 1951, for a total of 104 units. The original contract price was $7,800,000, including spare parts. The first cars arrived in the Port of Montreal in 1953, loaded on flat cars and taken by rail to Hillcrest shops. Further deliveries of Gloucester cars were made directly to Davisville yard via the CN siding that was all that remained of the Belt Line Railway. Cars 5004 and 5005 were the first to travel under their own power, on September 20, 1953. Further trips were made in October of that year to check tunnel clearance.

Canada’s First Subway Opens

Ontario Premier Leslie Frost and Toronto Mayor Allan Lamport officially opened the Yonge subway on March 30, 1954. Metro Chairman Frederick Gardiner and TTC Chairman W.C. McBrien were also in attendance. Crowds of people, including politicians from all three levels of government, TTC employees and print, radio and newsreel journalists (Toronto’s first television station did not start broadcasting until August of that year) gathered at Davisville station around 11:00 am. to listen to several self-congratulatory speeches. Chairman McBrien’s speech called for the immediate commencement of construction on the Queen Street streetcar subway and several other sweeping measures to reduce downtown congestion, including fringe parking lots, one-way streets and the adoption of staggered working hours. In his words, the Yonge Street subway line was “not the final solution of Toronto’s traffic problems. It is only the start of combating this monster. Many other (rapid transit) lines will have to be built in the future.” The chairman went on to warn that the TTC could not afford to build more subway lines without government assistance, a statement that would be verified in just five years.

Finally, the premier and the mayor together pushed a lever forward, changing a nearby block signal from amber to green. The subway was officially open.

Over six hundred invited guests boarded a train that departed Davisville station for Eglinton at 11:50 am. At 11:56, the train departed Eglinton for Union, arriving at exactly 12:10 pm. “Eglinton to Union in 12 Minutes” the newspaper headlines cried, although the first trip actually took fourteen minutes. Previously, that trip on the Yonge streetcar took 30 minutes, assuming traffic was favourable. A second train carried the overflow of dignitaries directly from Davisville to Union Station, and the party again moved to the Royal York Hotel. At 1:30 pm. the Yonge subway opened for the public. Those who had taken the streetcar to work took the subway home.

Last Yonge Streetcar

(Above) The end of an era. Witt #2574 and trailer 2897 prepare to depart Eglinton carhouse for Union Station for the last run, ever, of the Yonge streetcar. Photo donated by Curt Frey.

The Yonge streetcar line, established in 1861, faded from existence between 1:30 pm and two o’clock that afternoon. Earlier that month, the line had been cut back from Toronto’s northern city limits to Eglinton Avenue, looping counterclockwise around the traffic office at Eglinton carhouse. Soon thereafter, TTC crews worked on installing trolley bus overhead for a new route to run from Eglinton station to the city limits. Now, the last cars dropped off their passengers at Union Station and filed into Harbour Yard at the base of York Street. The last car left Front and York for Eglinton at 1:54 pm., and the very last train, comprised of Witt 2574 and trailer 2897, departed Eglinton for Front Street at 2:30 pm. Signs proclaiming it to be the last train were so large that most of the invited party of members from the Upper Canada Railroad Society rode in the trailer, so they could be able to see out.

For many of the cars, it would be the last time they would operate. The Yonge subway meant the end of service not only for Toronto’s premier streetcar line, but also for the Bay streetcar, as the St. Clair services were realigned into the subway.

Starting at 1:30 pm. Dupont streetcars were extended south on Bay Street to the Ferry Docks. The last Bay car was scheduled to leave Lansdowne Loop for the Ferry Docks at 1:29 pm., and the Ferry Docks for “Wychwood” (St. Clair Carhouse) at 2:07 pm. Earlscourt cars operating from St. Clair and Lansdowne to the Yonge subway replaced Bay cars on St. Clair Avenue while Avenue Road lost streetcar service altogether. Rogers Road streetcars were also extended east along St. Clair to the subway during rush hours. This change also resulted in the abandonment of the Bathurst tripper service along Front Street. Bathurst cars now ran exclusively from St. Clair Avenue to Adelaide and east on Adelaide to loop via Victoria, Richmond and Church. Other tripper services which fell included the Church Tripper and the downtown version of the Danforth tripper. These were replaced by extra streetcars operating on the Bloor route, and a revised Danforth tripper that ran from Luttrell to Bedford Loop, making connections with the Yonge subway at Bloor station. The Carlton tripper also ceased operation.

The Church streetcar operated for almost two months after the opening, but was bussed on May 16, 1954 to reduce the TTC’s electrical demands. The higher than expected electrical demand from the Yonge subway was blamed for a number of “brown-outs” in the area. Tracks were soon taken up or covered over on Front Street from York to Sherbourne.

A large number of Witts were rendered surplus as a result of these changes. The TTC retired every Witt trailer and all remaining two-man Peter Witt cars. Many were taken from Harbour Yard directly to the scrap heap.

A lot of time had to be spent fixing Yonge Street in the aftermath of the subway opening and the streetcar abandonment. The rehabilitation of Toronto’s main thoroughfare continued throughout 1954, with tracks either being removed or paved over. A Yonge Street reopening ceremony was scheduled for October 20, 1954, but then Hurricane Hazel intervened. Although technically only a tropical depression by the time it hit Toronto, this disaster still caused over $24 million in property damage and killed more than eighty Torontonians. The reopening ceremony was quickly reorganized into a fund-raising event to assist the storm victims.

The Yonge subway, however, was an overnight success. Riders flocked to try out the line, and commuters continued to use it long after the novelty wore off. Two-car Gloucester trains that were supposed to operate during periods of low ridership became very uncommon. Four-car trains became the minimum, and six-car trains standard in service. Eventually, ridership increased to the point where eight-car Gloucester trains operated from Monday through Saturday from the early morning to the early evening. Likewise, when the longer Montreal Locomotive Works and Hawker Siddeley cars arrived on the subway, Sunday service occasionally saw two-car Hawker trains at first, although four-car trains became the minimum and, after the 1990s, six-car trains became standard during all hours of operation.

The Design of the Yonge Subway.

The initial design of the Yonge subway stations was functional, with the walls covered in Vitrolite tiles in a simple design using a different pair of colours for each station. All stations except the two terminals had separate northbound and southbound platforms with the tracks in between; the eight stations of this design that were underground (King, Queen, Dundas, College, Wellesley, Bloor, Summerhill and St. Clair) were each divided lengthwise by a single line of painted, but otherwise bare, steel girders between the tracks, supporting the roof. Advertising panels were mounted on these girders. When the Vitrolite tiles were later replaced, the ad panels were moved to the platform walls, reducing the cost and also allowing them to be seen from the trains. The two open-air stations, Rosedale and Davisville, had no overall roofs and therefore no supports between the tracks.

The terminal stations, Eglinton and Union, each had a centre platform between the tracks, with two lines of roof supports along it (except where walls served this purpose, such as at the stairwells). These pillars contained steel girders but were finished in the same style as the walls.

Scissors crossovers were installed at the entrance to Union station, just north of King station, just south of College station, just north of Bloor station, just south of St. Clair station and at the entrance of Eglinton station. Because of the sharp curve between King station (under Yonge Street) and Union station (under Front), the two crossover tracks at Union had to be at a gentler angle than normal. Because of this angle, normal frogs would not work at the centre of the diamond, where the corresponding rails of the two tracks cross. Instead, a switch diamond was installed. This avoided the problem by using two pairs of switchpoints, which could be set for one track or the other. It is almost like two ordinary switches placed point-to-point, except that the tracks are aligned to allow only two through routes.

Davisville station was given a three-track design, which is still unique on the system, due to its location adjacent to the Davisville Yard. Approaching the station from either direction, a single crossover leads from the northbound to the southbound track, and then the southbound track splits into two tracks, with the southbound platform between them. The turnouts to the yard are off the west track, which can therefore be conveniently used for trains entering or leaving service, as well as an emergency diversion in case a train fails at this station on either of the other two tracks.

King station drawing

Artist conceptions of King (above) and Queen (below) stations. Simple to start with, with lots of stuff added later

Queen station drawing

By today’s standards, the fare booth area and street entrances of most stations were cramped. At Union station, entrances from each side of Front Street led to a single fare-collection area at mezzanine level. King was similar, but its southbound platform also had an unstaffed secondary exit, with one-way flow enforced by an escalator rather than a turnstile; this exit, leading directly to the corner of Melinda Street, is still in use today.

Queen station photo

Queen station today (Main entrance, northbound side), having seen many renovations and even a retiling in the intervening years. Photos by David Cavlovic. For comparison, see this shot at the very bottom, showing the northbound Queen platform circa 1975.

Queen station photo
subway-5701-27.jpg

The main entrance to Queen station, directly under the intersection of Yonge and Queen, had separate platform-level fare barriers on the northbound and southbound sides, but the two sides were connected within the fare-paid area by a pair of under-track passages. These were located on either side of the roughed-in station area for the Queen streetcar-subway line, and would have become the connecting passages between the two lines had the latter been built. Queen station also had a second staffed entrance serving Albert and Shuter Streets, with fare collection at mezzanine level. As at King, there was also a no-turnstile escalator exit from the southbound platform; this led directly into the basement level of the old Eaton’s store, and was closed when the new store (which later became Sears) in the Eaton Centre replaced it. Underground passages also connected the main entrance not only to Eaton’s but also to the Simpson’s (now The Bay) and Woolworth’s stores, setting a pattern followed by many later stations.

Dundas station was probably placed at a very shallow depth due to the expensive rock blasting mentioned previously; it was, and still remains, the only station with separate fare-paid zones for each platform. The turnstiles were along the edge of the platforms, with stairs leading directly to the street.

College station had a single mezzanine fare-collection area, similar to Union and King.

At Wellesley, unlike the five stations above, the subway was offset from the street. This allowed a small bus terminal to be built over the tracks, giving a convenient layout where passengers could change between bus and subway within the fare-paid zone rather than using a paper transfer. The fare barrier was at street level within the bus terminal building, so no mezzanine level was required.

The most noteworthy feature of Bloor station was its pair of special “transferway” streetcar platforms in the middle of Bloor Street, where it passed over the subway just east of Yonge. Similar in some respects to the streetcar safety islands that exist today on many streetcar routes, the Yonge subway transferway was wider, sheltered, and had stairs leading directly to the subway platforms. Cars were not allowed into the transferway. The platforms were long enough to house two PCC MU trains, and during rush hours separate sections of each platform were used to load and unload passengers. In contrast to this direct connection, passengers not transferring from streetcars had to take a passage leading south from Bloor Street to reach the small mezzanine level with the station’s fare barrier. The Bloor transferway continued to be used until 1966, when the first phase of the Bloor-Danforth subway opened; the south curb line of Bloor Street still shows the deviation where the street was widened for traffic to pass by it.

Rosedale station, like Wellesley, had its fare barrier at street-level just inside the entrance; the subway platforms here were in an open cut, so the entrance and the bus terminal were offset to one side, with stairs leading down to the platforms. Summerhill’s entrance layout was similar to Wellesley’s, but without the bus terminal since no bus routes served the station. At St. Clair, the main entrance featured a street-level fare barrier, but this was connected via a mezzanine level both to the subway platforms and the surface-route terminal; a second staffed entrance at the other end of the mezzanine connected to Pleasant Boulevard. Davisville had a similar layout to Rosedale.

Of all the stations, only Eglinton, where numerous connections with suburban buses were made, offered extensive facilities to handle large crowds. A large mezzanine level within the fare-paid area connected the stairs and escalator from the subway platform with stairs to two street entrances and to nine street-level bus platforms; an additional bus platform with multiple stops was outside the paid area. Eglinton station also boasted a set of washrooms, the only ones on the subway until the Bloor line opened in 1966.

Bloor Streetcar Transferway Bloor Station Plan View

(above) Two artists renderings show the original Bloor station, its relationship to Bloor Street, and the Bloor streetcar transferway. Note the curve in the southern sidewalk to accommodate the platform in the middle of the street.

(below) This photograph, by Julian Bernard, donated by Curt Frey, shows the transferway in action.

Bloor Streetcar Transferway

Initially, paper transfers were required to change between subway and surface vehicles and all stations from College to Union. All other stations (except Summerhill, with no connecting routes) featured bus, trolley bus, or streetcar platforms within the subway’s fare-paid zone, allowing riders to transfer without any fare check. Particularly noteworthy was Bloor station, whose streetcar platforms were located in a special “transferway” in the middle of Bloor Street, just east of Yonge. Similar in some respects to the streetcar safety islands that exist today on many streetcar routes, the Yonge subway transferway was wider, sheltered and had stairs leading directly to the subway platforms. The transferway was long enough to house two PCC MU trains and, during rush hours, separate sections of each platform were used to load and unload passengers. The platform continued to be used until 1966, when the first phase of the Bloor subway opened. Evidence of this transferway can still be seen today in the curve in the south side of the street, just east of Yonge Street. The sidewalk narrowed to make room for the platforms and for the lanes of traffic. Cars were not allowed into the transferway.

Changes Since Opening

The oldest segment of Toronto’s subway network, the original Yonge subway has seen the most change. As Toronto’s downtown grew and redeveloped, use of the line increased. Many mezzanines were expanded, escalators were added, and some stations got additional, completely new entrances (King, Bloor, St. Clair, Davisville and Eglinton). Eglinton station has had multiple changes to its entrances and mezzanine configuration, most recently including a complete replacement of its bus terminal. As Union Station became the hub of a large and growing commuter train network known as GO Transit, the mezzanine level at the TTC’s Union station was expanded and reconfigured to handle the additional loads, and even to allow people not taking the TTC to cross through it to the Royal Bank Centre. A skyscraper boom in the sixties created a sprawling complex of shopping concourses beneath the downtown streets known unofficially as the “Underground City” (officially known as PATH since 1990). Built to connect office workers to the subway, PATH has also been responsible for many of the changes seen at Union, King and Queen stations. The construction of the Toronto Eaton Centre at Dundas and Yonge significantly altered that station, with several entrances built into the mall, and an enclosed connection between the platforms (albeit outside the fare-paid zone) finally built.

Redevelopment altered Wellesley and Davisville stations, with office buildings being built over what had previously been open-air bus terminals. In 1958, the TTC opened its new headquarters over top of the Davisville station bus terminal, and a shopping and office complex over top of Eglinton station continues to net the TTC hundreds of thousands of dollars in rent payments each year.

Woodlawn Avenue

A train heads northbound towards St. Clair station. Woodlawn Avenue is above the tunnel portal. This open cut was decked over for development in the early 1970s. Photo by R. Hill; donated by Rob Hutch.

The cut and cover section between Summerhill and St. Clair stations were decked over in sections in the late 1960s and the early 1970s (click here for more information). The new tunnel retains the sloped sides of the original open cut. The original four road overbridges, unevenly spaced, can still be seen inside the newer tunnel between Summerhill and St. Clair stations. These road bridges are located at Summerhill, Woodlawn, Jackes, and Rosehill Avenues. These road bridges, like the rest on the original Yonge line, used to be identified by a black on white sign, and many are still viewable, though in various stages of decay. Several other overbridges between Bloor and Eglinton stations still have clearly visible and legible street signs, but some have completely rusted to illegibility (including Price) while others are missing or in one case half-fallen (Hillsdale, seen from northbound train as of January 2001).

Little-used scissors crossovers at King, College (officially known as Gerrard crossover) and St. Clair (officially known as Rosehill crossover) disappeared in May 1984, June 1985 and March 1986 respectively during track rehabilitation. This change was made to reduce maintenance costs. The King and College sites can still be spotted by the gaps in the centre tunnel wall. St. Clair’s crossing was located immediately south of the Pleasant Boulevard portal, and thus had no centre wall in which to leave a gap behind.

In 1959, construction began extending the Yonge subway west and north from Union station, up University Avenue to St. George and Bloor as the first phase of the University-Bloor-Danforth project. As the new terminus at St. George was also approached on a sharp curve, the switch diamond from Union was moved there when the University subway opened in 1963; the scissors at Union was replaced by a single crossover. The University subway proved to be underused, and within a year of the opening of the Bloor-Danforth extensions to Islington and Warden through to the opening of the Spadina subway (January 28, 1978), it was closed after 9:45 pm and all day on Sundays. During these closures, the single crossover meant that all trains had to reverse on a single track at Union, the one normally used for University-bound trains.

The opening of the Bloor-Danforth subway in 1966 brought considerable changes to Bloor station. The abandonment of streetcars on Bloor Street meant the abandonment of the Bloor Street transferway and new stairwells were built between the Bloor station platforms and Yonge station on the Bloor line. Thus, Bloor station became the only station on the system to lose fare-paid transfer facilities between subway and surface routes.

In 1969, construction began on the North Yonge extension, resulting in a further expansion of the Eglinton station concourse. For the first years of operation, Eglinton station remained a short-turn terminal for every second rush-hour train. In 1980, this short-turn was officially terminated, although unscheduled short-turns continued until the slower Gloucester cars were removed from the system.

In the late 1980s, Union Station was renovated again, this time to install a connection between the subway and the terminus of the Harbourfront LRT line. When the new streetcar line opened in 1990, Union Station offered direct transfers with a connecting route for the first time since its opening, 36 years earlier.

As the subway got older, renovations changed the look of the old stations as well. The Vitrolite that had been used for the station tiles had long been unavailable in mass production. Broken tiles had to be replaced by pieces of metal repainted to match. One by one, the stations were retiled, often in new colours and often with the new tiles mounted directly over the originals. Rosedale station lost its green-blue tiling and its black trim to a dark green tiling and yellow lettering (no trim) even though the station had been declared “historic” by the Toronto Historical Society. Of the Yonge subway’s twelve original stations, only Eglinton retains many of its original tiles, and thus something like its original look.

Proposals for More Changes

As the subway expanded and ridership increased, so too did the TTC’s reliance on the original Yonge subway. By the early 1980s, some parts of the line were handling as many as 40,000 passengers per direction per hour, beyond the design capacity of the subway. The University subway had been built to effectively double the capacity of the Yonge subway south of Bloor, but it too was nearing capacity. At this time, the TTC brought forward a number of plans to try and relieve pressure on the line.

The first plan to emerge in the early 1980s was a proposal to construct a Downtown Relief line from Pape station on the Bloor-Danforth subway to Union Station. Commuters from Scarborough would transfer to this line for a faster trip downtown, thus bypassing the overcrowded Bloor-Yonge interchange. The new line was estimated to cost in the neighbourhood of $500 million. When the Network 2011 proposal was released in 1985, the study predicted that a Downtown Relief Line could be open by 1998. Stalling from Queen’s Park delayed the approval of the plan, and support for the Downtown Relief Line, never very strong to begin with, diminished rapidly.

Bloor station photo Bloor station photo Bloor station photo

Taking advantage of new office construction just over a decade ago the TTC greatly expanded the platform capacity of Bloor station nearly doubling its previous capacity. Photos by David Cavlovic.

An equally ambitious proposal in the wake of the Downtown Relief Line’s failure was a complete redesign of the Bloor-Yonge interchange. A TTC report submitted in the late 1989 suggested widening Bloor station, expanding the platforms, pulling the tracks further apart and installing a centre platform between them. Subway trains entering the station would open both sets of doors, and passengers would enter the train from one of the side platforms and leave by the centre platform. If built, these changes would have allowed the TTC to decrease the intervals between trains on the Yonge subway from two minutes, ten seconds to just ninety seconds.

The proposal was estimated to cost $153 million and would have resulted in Bloor station being closed for up to six months. The plan was controversial, to say the least, and the TTC quickly backed down from it. They did take the opportunity of a major building construction over the site to significantly expand the platforms and add new street entrances to the station complex, however. The work included rebuilding the roof over more than half of the station’s length. The rebuilt roof no longer requires centre posts; it is supported by columns set well back on the platforms, on the part that will be retained in place if the middle platform is ever added.

To try and relieve the crush of passengers on the Yonge subway cheaply and immediately, the TTC also installed direct-downtown express buses, looping downtown via Richmond and Adelaide Streets and running to Don Mills and Eglinton, Mount Pleasant and Eglinton, and Avenue Road and Wilson. It was hoped that the prospect of a direct ride downtown would lure some passengers away from the trains. It worked enough for the TTC to keep the services. The decline in ridership experienced in the early 1990s reduced the need for more express buses as well as the calls for even more extreme measures. The downtown express buses would have faded from existence, but the TTC’s decision to charge premium fares made them cost-effective enough to be kept.

The Future of the Yonge Subway

Eglinton Terminal Redevelopment Plans Eglinton Terminal Crosssection

(Above) Richard Hooles submitted these plans for the rebuilding of Eglinton station’s bus terminal. These were later revised to the plan seen below (submitted by David Fisher).

subway-5102-23.jpg

As the Yonge subway continues to age, changes will continue to be made. In April 2004, the TTC closed down and demolished the bus terminal at Eglinton station, replacing it with a temporary facility just south of the location, where Eglinton garage used to be. The TTC had expected to completely rebuild the terminal, to go beneath a new tower to rise from the site, but plans have been put on hold. The proposal to build an underground LRT beneath Eglinton Avenue will have a great affect on the station, both in terms of how the LRT will connect to the subway, and the size required for the corresponding bus terminal. The “temporary” bus loop facility is, as of June 2011, now over six years old, and looks likely to serve TTC patrons for at least another few years.

Artist's rendering of new Union Station platform

The TTC’s plan for a second platform for Union station calls for construction on the south side of the station, creating a unique platform arrangement. The mezzanine level would also be greatly expanded.

Union Station Platform Union Station Mezzanine

The TTC has also long desired to increase the capacity of Union station. The station is already under pressure from increasing development in the area, and the presence of two major sports venues causes significant headaches in the form of spike traffic. A proposal to install a second platform on the south side of the station, as well as significantly expand the mezzanine area of the station, is now in the design phase. The proposal was kickstarted during Toronto’s campaign to host 2008 Olympic games. However, even without the games, Union Station is now the fourth busiest station on the network, and a second platform is already vital.

Waterfront Toronto is currently responsible for paying for the construction of a second platform at Union station, but progress on this renovation has been slowed due to conflicts with other renovations taking place at the Union train station. It is, however, only a matter of time before this needed improvement is made.

The Greater Toronto Area continues to grow north along the Yonge street axis. GO Transit feeds thousands of passengers into the Yonge subway daily at Union, Finch and York Mills stations. The Sheppard subway and, later, the Eglinton LRT, will further add thousands of passengers to this overloaded line. As the downtown core booms, so too will the line’s ridership. The Yonge subway as it stands has little extra capacity to offer, and the TTC may have to take extraordinary measures in the future to ensure that the Yonge subway is able to continue to meet the needs of Toronto’s commuters.


Next, see the University subway.

 

 

 


Other Yonge Subway Images

Rosedale Station Plan

An artist’s rendering of Crescent station (until 1953, the planned name for today’s Rosedale station), showing subway platforms and bus terminal. The layout has not changed significantly from this plan.

Rosedale Station

Curt Frey donated this photograph of a two-car Gloucester train running southbound through Rosedale station in the early days of the Yonge subway.

St. Clair Station

Artist’s rendition of a cross-section of St. Clair station, looking west.

St. Clair Station

An artist’s rendition of the Pleasant Boulevard entrance to St. Clair station, including the bus terminal platform and roadway. Like Wellesley station, this entrance has been built over, this time with an office building and garage.

Davisville, Original Entrance

An artist’s rendition of the original entrance to Davisville Station, before the TTC headquarters was built on top of it.

Davisville Station and Yard

This is a shot taken from the old Belt Line railway right-of-way near Lascalles Boulevard. It is looking northeast towards the Yonge-Davisville intersection. Here, you can see the Davisville Yard and the William McBrien headquarters for the TTC. Photo by George Davidson.

Eglinton Terminal layout

An artist’s rendition of the Eglinton station terminal, showing bus bays. Note the large single-storey building on Yonge. A small temporary entrance was first put there, then the first tower of Canada Square was built on top of it. Note also the diagonal bus driveway from the corner of Yonge and Eglinton, which was in fact built and was used until that corner was built on around 1970.

Eglinton crosssection

An artist’s rendition of a cross-section of Eglinton station, showing platforms, mezzanine level and entrance to the bus bays.

Eglinton station photo

The original bus bay concourse passenger waiting area of Eglinton station, looking west. Photo by David Cavlovic.

Eglinton station photo

Until the closure of the original bus terminal in 2004, passengers could enter Eglinton station here at the corner of Eglinton and Duplex. Passengers could walk directly to platform #10, or take the stairs down to the mezzanine level. Photo by David Cavlovic.

References

  • Bromley, John F. and Jack May Fifty Years of Progressive Transit, Electric Railroaders’ Association, New York (New York), 1973.
  • Corley, Ray, Subway Car: 57 Foot Class G Cars, Toronto Transit Commission, Toronto (Ontario), February 1988.
  • Filey, Mike, Not a One-Horse Town: 125 Years of Toronto and its Streetcars, Gagne Printing, Louiseville (Quebec), 1986.
  • Filey, Mike, The TTC Story: The First Seventy-Five Years, Dundurn Press, Toronto (Ontario) 1996.
  • Howell, Peter. “Subway’s ‘heart’ to get surgery.” The Toronto Star Jan 5, 1990: ?.
  • Howell, Peter. “Bloor station won’t close as TTC retreats on plan.” The Toronto Star Jan 10, 1990: A6.
  • Lowry, Hollie. “The Opening of the Yonge Street Subway and the Subway Cars.” The Turnout March 1994: p10-19.
  • Smith, Douglas N.W. “Canada’s First Subway: From Conception to Operation.” Canadian Rail Passenger Review #3 p80-93.
  • Toronto Transit Commission, Sidewalk Superintendents’ Manual Grade 1: Toronto Subway, The Toronto Transit Commission, Toronto (Ontario), 1951.
  • Toronto Transit Commission, Sidewalk Superintendents’ Manual Grade 2: Toronto Subway, The Toronto Transit Commission, Toronto (Ontario), 1952.
  • Toronto Transit Commission, Sidewalk Superintendents’ Manual Grade 3: Toronto Subway, The Toronto Transit Commission, Toronto (Ontario), 1953.
  • Willard, Harold. “Eglinton to Union 12 Minutes.” The Toronto Star Mar 30, 1954: A1.

We are indebted to Ray Corley, Geoffrey Skelsey and Mark Brader for providing sources and additional information to make this web article possible.







About this Page

This page is an article within the Subway division of Transit Toronto articles.

To see more articles within the Subway division, you may return to the Subway division page.

You can also return to the main page for news and other articles in Transit Toronto.